Some data may appear in published literature missed by our classifier, so they will appear in the "hypothesis" section instead of the "known gene summary" section. For the gene summaries, all data objects have a corresponding publication, so this should limit the risk of any unproven facts being classified as "known." And remember: these are hypotheses after all.
Could a "hypothesis" be known or a "gene summary fact" be unsubstantiated by scientific literature?
Articles in this category
- What features and capabilities does Heureka support?
- What sets Heureka apart from other AI solutions?
- Do I need a computational background to use Heureka tools?
- Does Heureka really analyze each project from scratch, or does it utilize templates or pipelines to generate reports?
- What is a QuartzReport?
- How does Heureka's bioinformatics and interpretation solution, QuartzReport, work?
- How does Heureka come up with hypotheses?
- How can I know if hypotheses are credible?
- How should I cite Heureka in my work?
- How do credits work?
- What is 'Extended Reasoning' in ARC?